Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
949-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

949-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023206 50.876335)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023135 50.876328,-1.023138 50.876342,-1.023148 50.876354,-1.023164 50.876364,-1.023183 50.876371,-1.023205 50.876373,-1.023227 50.876371,-1.023247 50.876365,-1.023263 50.876355,-1.023273 50.876343,-1.023277 50.876329,-1.023274 50.876315,-1.023264 50.876302,-1.023249 50.876292,-1.023229 50.876286,-1.023207 50.876283,-1.023185 50.876285,-1.023165 50.876292,-1.023149 50.876301,-1.023139 50.876314,-1.023135 50.876328)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL